Cyberstrategics

In Orwellian Event Processing the discussion moved away from my original intent, which was primarily to discuss the vendor-state-of-denial regarding the prior art for processing complex events, and gravitated toward a discussion on the “inefficiencies” of rule-based systems.  I was surprised learn that there are professionals who believe that there is no basis in fact [...]

Filed under: Analytics, Artificial Intelligence, Business Rules, CEP Terminology, CEP Tutorials, Complex Event Processing, Cybersecurity, Detection Theory, Event Processing, Event Processing Technical Society, False Positives and Negatives, Systems Engineering | 6 Comments »

Recently we completed the installation and training of an open source Bayesian classifier to replace a rule-based approach to manage forum spam.  In a nutshell, we found the rule-based approach was highly prone to both false positives and false negatives; however, a statistical approach using a Bayesian approach has turned out to be far superior. [...]

Filed under: Advanced Event Processing, Artificial Intelligence, Business Rules, CEP Terminology, CEP Tutorials, Complex Event, Complex Event Processing, Cybersecurity, Detection Theory, Event Cloud, Event Processing, Event Stream Processing, False Positives and Negatives, Open Source, Situation Models, Systems Engineering, Use Cases | 16 Comments »

Back in the days when I was happily spending time on the operations floor in computing centers, we always observed that the greatest security threats to our systems were well-intended operators who make simple mistakes.  No hacker or criminal ever brought down a network like the bored network guy on the late shift who decided [...]

Filed under: Cloud Computing, Cybersecurity, Cyberstrategics, Detection Theory, False Positives and Negatives, Risk Management, Security Event Management, Simple Event Processing, Threats and Vulnerabilities, Use Cases | No Comments »

Here is an excellent Google TechTalk by Dr. Majorie Shapiro (LBL & LHC ATLAS), June 18, 2007, on processing complex events at the LHC called, Supersymmetry, Extra Dimensions and the Origin of Mass: Exploring the Nature of the Universe Using PetaScale Data Analysis.
This is really what I would call “real-time CEP.”  Bean collisions at the [...]

Filed under: CEP News and Events, CEP Tutorials, Complex Event, Complex Event Processing, Detection Theory, Event Processing, Event Stream Processing, Sensor Fusion, Situation Models, Use Cases | 4 Comments »

Here is one of my favorite news stories of the week, Guilty Plea for Man Behind Creative E-Trade Scam.
In this funny story, Michael Largent, 23, of Plumas Lake, CA, wrote a simple  Internet script that opened more than 58,000 online accounts at places like E-trade and Schwab.   Largent used fake names to automatically open [...]

Filed under: Complex Event Processing, Cybersecurity, Detection Theory, Financial Services, Fraud Detection, Use Cases | 1 Comment »

Using NIST as computer science reference, an online algorithm is an algorithm that processes data (including events) element-by-element (and event-by-event), serially without having the entire problem space available from the beginning.  In contrast, an offline algorithm is provided the entire problem set from the start.
Hence, real-time event processing applications generally involve online processing.  Offline processing is useful when creating models [...]

Filed under: Advanced Event Processing, Analytics, Apache Mahout, CEP Tutorials, Complex Event Processing, Cyber-Trading Technologies, Cybersecurity, Detection Theory, Event Processing, False Positives and Negatives, Sensor Fusion, Systems Engineering, Use Cases | No Comments »

Detection experts understand that the optimal detection design and architecture is generally a combination of both signature and anomaly detection engines.   In event processing, signature detection involves the real-time pattern matching analysis of events.   A core advantage of signature detection is that basic pattern matching models are easy to understand and develop [...]

Filed under: Advanced Event Processing, Analytics, Artificial Intelligence, Business Optimization, CEP Terminology, Complex Event Processing, Cybersecurity, Detection Theory, Event Processing, Event Processing Modelling, False Positives and Negatives, Modelling and Simulation, Performance, Process Optimization, Situation Models, Systems Engineering, Threats and Vulnerabilities | No Comments »

For archiving purposes, I have uploaded 24 public CEP presentations that I presented over an 18 month period at various conferences from March 14, 2006 to September 21, 2007.  These presentations can be viewed here.  For example, my first public CEP presentation:
View SlideShare presentation or Upload your own. (tags: event processing)
So far, I have placed [...]

Filed under: Adapters, Advanced Event Processing, Agents, Analytics, Artificial Intelligence, Asia Pacific, Blackboard Architecture, Business Activity Monitoring, Business Event Processing, Business Events, Business Optimization, Business Process Management, Business Rules, CEP News and Events, CEP Terminology, CEP Tutorials, Cloud Computing, Complex Event, Complex Event Processing, Consulting, Cybersecurity, Detection Theory, Development and Evaluation, EAI ESB & SOA, EDA, EPRAWG, EPTS, Education and Training, Event Cloud, Event Processing, Event Processing Language, Event Processing Technical Society, Event Stream Processing, Event-Driven Architecture, False Positives and Negatives, Financial Services, Fraud Detection, Intrusion Detection, Message-Oriented Middleware, Modelling and Simulation, POSETS, Predictive Business, Process Optimization, Reference Architecture, Risk Management, Scheduling, Security Event Management, Sensor Fusion, Simple Event Processing, Situation Models, Standards, Systems Engineering, TIBCO, Threats and Vulnerabilities, Use Cases | 2 Comments »